Challenge phases Main content User comments Concept's statistics and author info Related themes, inspirations and concepts Share concept Shallenge activity feed Footer links
Login

The Challenge

1023 followers

How might we better connect food production and consumption? Read the challenge brief

Concept

UPDATED: Rethinking Food Transportation (suggesting a three-step change-process)

For achieving this rethinking and implementing change successfully, we require the understanding of the holistic network behind the current situation. Below I suggest a change-process which emphasises exactly that necessity: the Multilevel Service Design Approach. By looking at the bigger picture, this approach allows the identification of underlying problem areas and enables the (re)design of better solution together with all stakeholders.
Instead of delivering fresh food via central distribution centres, local distribution should be enhanced. This accounts especially for fresh products and organic farmers.

Queensland's farmers are dependent from a very few supermarket brands. These supermarket chains collect all the products at one or two distribution centres and then distribute the products again. Especially for fresh food this is not only inefficient but also has negative impacts in terms of food quality, CO2 emissions, and supporting local farmers. What about opening a local farmer section at every supermarket? Fresher, better, and local food can be labelled with the farmers' address and sold at nearby markets. Even the step forward and supporting especially organic farmers would be an alternative to the current situation. These ideas are already established in many countries in Europe. Now it's time for Australia to follow!

What actions would need to be taken to turn this idea into a reality?

I suggest adapting a method called Multilevel Service Design (MSD). MSD looks at the holistic picture and includes 3 stages:

1) The Holistic Network
That means looking at the whole network with all stakeholder included. By doing so, we understand why supermarkets use this form of distribution and not another one. It is crucial to understand the network behind the current service concept because if you don't look at the bigger/holistic picture, changes may not be successful. This network includes B2B (e.g. farmers-supermarket-transportation-government), B2C (e.g. supermarket-customers), and C2C (e.g. customer-customers).

2) The Distribution System Analysis
After identifying the holistic network, the system itself gets identified. That is done by analysing the Service System Architecture (visual and systematic breakdown of the whole system) and the Service System Navigation (the flows and links within the system). This is important for identifying bottlenecks within the current systems or opportunities for add-ons to make the system more efficient and effective.

3) The Distribution System Redesign
Now we have a profound understanding of the current status and can start to redesign the distribution system in that way that bottlenecks and add-ons are efficient and effective not only on the distribution system itself but for the whole network.

That means that all stakeholders get a positive outcome (increased value propositions) and therefore agree to the changes: The customer has access to fresher food and gains higher well-being; the supermarket receives less food waste, lower costs, and higher satisfaction; the farmers receive more income and recognition; the government gains lower CO2 emissions and improved economic results.

But that also means that all stakeholders need to be involved in the (re)design process! Otherwise they may not agree to the changes even though the changes would be meaningful as they may not understand/accept them.

Source: Patricio, L. et al. (2011). Multilevel Service Design: From Customer Value Constellation to Service Experience Blueprinting. Journal of Service Research, 14(2), 180-200.

Who might make a good partner for this project?

Representatives of
- major supermarket chains & logistic centres
- farmers
- government (agriculture, infrastructure, transportation, environment)
- consumers
- transportation & logistics
- service designers (public, network & infrastructure)
- infrastructure and network planners
- universities (using the knowledge and expertise of academics)

What suggestions would you have for potential sources of funding for the development of this project?

Government (funding for research & concept development)
University (knowledge, expertise, running the project)
Government (putting the changes into place - changes on public level)
Supermarkets (putting the changes into place - changes on private level)

1

How effectively do you think that this concept reconnects food consumers and producers?

It would reconnect food consumers and producers strongly
It would somewhat reconnect food consumers and producers 
It would not significantly reconnect food consumers and producers 
2

How scalable is this idea across communities and geographies?

This concept can be scaled across many communities 
This concept will take a fair bit of work to build and scale
This concept is not particularly scalable 
3

How quickly could this concept be impactful? 

This concept could happen today
This concept could happen soon with some work
I struggle to see this happening in a reasonable timeframe
4

How original is this concept?

This concept is extremely original
This concept has some original aspects
This concept already exists
5

Overall, how do you feel about this concept?

This concept rocked my world – it’s brilliant
I liked this concept but preferred others
This concept didn’t get me overly excited
1

How effectively do you think that this concept reconnects food consumers and producers?

2

How scalable is this idea across communities and geographies?

3

How quickly could this concept be impactful? 

4

How original is this concept?

5

Overall, how do you feel about this concept?

6

Thanks so much for your input - if there is anything that you think we should be aware of feel free to submit it below. These comments will not be public - if you would like to leave comments for the concept author please do in the Comment box below...

Comments

Join the conversation and post a comment.

April 27, 2011, 03:35AM
Hi Jakob,
I've come across an article on springwise that features Hubbub - company that combines deliveries from small, local grocers into one delivery. When reading your concept, brought this to mind... might make for good reading / further ideas?

http://www.hubbub.co.uk/
Louise Wilson's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
May 25, 2011, 04:53PM
Interesting company, Stacy. Thanks for sharing the website! It's helpful for a project I'm currently working on!
May 12, 2011, 03:56AM
Just found that report on the news... Global food losses and food waste report form the FAO. Shocking results especially for North America and Oceania. And: 40-50% is wasted in the consumer stage.

It doesn't really fit to my concept here but I post it as an inspiration for any further building in the refinement stage.

http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ags/publications/GFL_web.pdf
Michael Stillwell's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
May 17, 2011, 12:07AM
Wow, excellent resource, thanks!
Louise Wilson's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
May 25, 2011, 04:50PM
Thanks for sharing, Jakob!
May 20, 2011, 01:53AM
Jakob – given you were at the Ideas Festival – we expect you'll have problems adding some innovative and informed builds here!
May 16, 2011, 09:56PM
http://www.openideo.com/open/localfood/inspiration/shutl-get-your-ordered-groceries-within-90-mins

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJwLvoWJyjs

Shutl would be interesting reference, I used to live with Tom, the founding partner who is a really cool guy. All forms of courier are in communication with each other asking couriers to pick and drop throughout the city becoming more of intelligent conveyer belts than our current system of trucks going to back and forth needlessly overlapping.
May 13, 2011, 08:29AM
Hi Jakob congrats being selected. And thanks for linking to my "one village one product" idea - I think that they are quite related.

A couple of comments on your updated idea. I think it's important to look at distribution (supply) but I think one of the keys to making this work is stimulating "decentralized" demand.

I don't think it's a enough to merely involve consumers and "stakeholders" in the system design. It would have to go further.

It seems to me initially government (both local and QLD) can play a really large role in this, whether it be through procurement procedures that favor local - local, or helping promote products from neighboring regions.

What do you think?
Jakob Trischler's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
May 13, 2011, 08:54AM
Hi Janet thanks for your thoughts and feedback. Yeah you're right about the decentralisation. That should be the key of the concept. With my update I was just pointing out the bigger picture before looking at the necessity of decentralisation itself. I think that is also what you mean with stating: It would have to go further with just involving consumers and stakeholders.

Of course, and maybe I wasn't specific enough in that, we have to include all groups, firms, and institutions who have influence or interest in the current situation and possible changes. I, however, still have to sort out who is on the core of this change process. Is it the supermarkets, the government and their policies, the farmers, the consumers, or the transportation firms? Or a mix of some of them?
Janet Gunter's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
May 13, 2011, 06:04PM
I think you are right to see this a complex system! It would be good to conduct some kind of stakeholder analysis, I know it sounds so cliché (or at least to me). But this is key to even thinking about how to proceed with your project. Some people will oppose a collaborative "redesign" no matter how much you "involve" them. We have to recognize that the current system exists because it serves certain interests, not just by coincidence.
May 13, 2011, 09:20AM
Way to go on making the Shortlist on the Local Food Challenge! Selecting 20 concepts out of over 600 was a tough job and we're excited to have you move through to the Refinement Phase. You can get a low-down on how the phase works over on Field Notes: http://bit.ly/refine_lowdown

Basically over the next 10 days we'd like you to further fine-tune your idea. You might explore opportunities and challenges to implementation, visualise further, expand on engagement strategies or connect various dots and details that would assist bringing your concept into fruition.

If you hit the Update This button on the right of your post, you'll see we've added 5 new fields to help you refine: Concept Builds, Actions, Project Partners, Funding Sources and Virtual Team. Check them out and feel free to keep updating your post throughout the phase – based on feedback and collaboration with fellow OpenIDEATORS and your own ideating goodness!
May 01, 2011, 07:59AM
Hey Jacob we were in the same in Central Qld except we didn't have the quick trip across the border to restock. We new there were fresh produce to the north but the distribution system is setup to go to the centre (well SEQ as the central spot). We even had big growers dumping crops as they didn't think to send it north. We're working on a regional food strategy that means food can stay here or travel north and south or further afield.
Jakob Trischler's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
May 02, 2011, 07:38AM
Cool! Thanks for sharing your experiences as well! I had a look at your concept you're suggesting. I really like it. I think the main challenge will be to give the retailers (which are a few and farmers are mainly dependent on them) a reason why they should give up their current system. The floods didn't really change anything. Further, we need to analyse if customers are willing to pay more for local food. Then we can build on that and co-design a holistically agreed concept. :)
Johan Löfström's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
May 02, 2011, 07:51AM
I am convinced that if customers knows the payment to the farmer is going to pay his income tax to our local community, (and that the farmers family is shopping their clothes and other products locally and so on.)

We are all going to be much more inclined to shop our food locally.

Multinational distributors and farmers in other countries pay all of their taxes abroad. And buys all of their supplies abroad.

(I do not suggest shutting down all borders completely, some free trade is healthy across international regions)
April 10, 2011, 06:55PM
Nice one Jakob! Maybe the large supermarket brands could introduce this to their own supply management chains... For example, they would make sure that the stores in region X would get a certain share of products from local and surrounding producers, distinct form the ones the stores in region Y would get.
Samantha Harmon's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
April 29, 2011, 07:26PM
Whole Foods Market-San Francisco recently launched a new store that focused on local products. You can read more about it here: http://bit.ly/ge9jXG

I believe this store illustrates what you mentioned Sarah-how different store regions can carry region specific foods, supporting the local food talent, even so far as micro-financing food entrepreneurs.



Sarah Fathallah's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
April 29, 2011, 07:41PM
Great find Samantha! Feels good to see this coming from a big brand account like Whole Foods.
Jakob Trischler's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
May 02, 2011, 07:39AM
Make us hope for our examples!!! :) Great research Samantha! :)
April 29, 2011, 07:30PM
This is such an important concept to consider as we-consumers-desire more locally sourced fresh foods in our diet!! How can we most efficiently and affordably create the infrastructure to support this demand, to support local/family farmers? A friend and I built a concept around this same question http://bit.ly/hic8Rn

Great job Jakob!
April 29, 2011, 02:49PM
Jakob, I like that you address issues in this concept that you've experienced first hand.
Let me know your thoughts about the folloiwng concept that addresses some supply chain inefficiencies- http://bit.ly/jaKQgf.
Let me know your thoughts.
April 28, 2011, 11:59AM
Jakob, if you are available maybe you would join us at the workshop we are running with OpenIDEO in Brisbane on the 18th 19th May. Let's chat about this. Ewan
Jakob Trischler's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
April 28, 2011, 11:02PM
Hi Ewan, Yes 18th and 19th May would be fine for me. It would be great to get the opportunity to join the workshop! Particularly as I am doing my PhD on Service Design. I live just an 1h drive away from Brisbane so perfect venue for me as well. Happy to discuss it further with you. Cheers, Jakob
April 27, 2011, 03:35AM
Hi Jakob,
I've come across an article on springwise that features Hubbub - company that combines deliveries from small, local grocers into one delivery. When reading your concept, brought this to mind... might make for good reading / further ideas?

http://www.hubbub.co.uk/

April 27, 2011, 02:37AM
I also posted this comment on Sarah's concept but I think it offers a nice example how food distribution currently works in Queensland: As my concept visualises, food get delivered to Brisbane from whole Queensland (QLD) and then redelivered to the supermarkets around QLD. If it can't delivered that way, no fresh food will be available in QLD's supermarkets.

My example: During the flood season (I live in QLD close to the border to the southern state New South Wales (NSW)) here in Southern QLD we had no fresh food in the supermarkets. They were empty. However, and this shows how inflexible this system is, I went over the NSW boarder just a 10min drive from my home and found the supermarkets packed with fresh food. No signs of shortage. The very same supermarket as in QLD but a completely different picture. Only that NSW collects their food in another centre (maybe near Sydney) and then delivers it to the supermarkets around NSW.

Just a comparison: Sydney-Northern NSW: 1000km; Brisbane-Northern NSW: 90km. Therefore my contribution: rethinking food transportation.
April 26, 2011, 10:25PM
Great point Jakob! I though about something in this way. Why not buying online from producers and delivering in supermarkets of your choice?
I wrote some more details about it on my post "Customized supply chain"
Jakob Trischler's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
April 27, 2011, 02:14AM
Thanks Priscila! I had a look at your concept and I really like it. The customised supply chain can especially help with demand forecasts as I discussed with Johan on my other concept: http://openideo.com/open/localfood/concepting/what-happens-to-bread-after-day-one/.

In regards to rethinking food transportation, I'm not sure how your idea helps with reducing efficiency concerning transportation. Food would still be processed through the same distribution ways. It is also important to think about the timeframe: when do you need to order online to get your food delivered? I personally don't know what I need 5min before I start cooking. I also like to check the food at the supermarket if I'm satisfied with the quality. Last but not least we need to make sure that your concept doesn't end in additional packaging (as customised food often gets customised packaged and labeled). :)
April 13, 2011, 12:13PM
Hey Jacob, your idea has great inspirational value! The first question I had in mind was "What are the existing networks/services/systems that act as a means for decentralization?" I built on your concept with that very thought : http://goo.gl/fUSn4

I believe it also looks at Sarah's point "Municipalities often have a lot of public infrastructure that could be leveraged..." with a different perspective.
Kaushik Eshwar's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
April 13, 2011, 12:20PM
Ah! sorry, I think I misspelled your name, Jakob.
Jakob Trischler's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
April 26, 2011, 10:11PM
Yeah Kaushik you are right. As you discuss in your concept there a lot of alternative opportunities to transport food from A to B. This accounts especially for big metropolises. The only thing here in Australia is: except of the metropolises there is hardly public transport... so we need to think about an opportunity how food can be delivered to the metropolises. James' contribution above could have food for thought there :)
April 25, 2011, 03:27AM
Do you remember the methods of heat transfer from Science class.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_transfer

Conduction/Diffusion: between objects in physical contact
Convection: due to motion
Radiation: by emission/absorption of electromagnetic radiation
Mass transfer: Physically moving an object containing that energy.

If I were to make an analogy of their equivalents relevant to delivery systems.

Conduction. Pass parcels neighbor to neighbor to get into the centre.
Convection: Delivery trucks deliver parcels to centre.
Radiation: Parcels are teleported to centre by a man named Scotty.
Mass Transfer: Move the whole planet, so technically the parcel is in the right place, but it still would be in the same part of the planet.

Convection is what we use for distribution at the moment, Radiation and Mass transfer are not feasible options, but conduction provides some inspiration to how your system might work. In the case of heat, it can move by all the methods above, our delivery systems move by one.

If advances in technology and communication could work to create this "pass the parcel" system through the city, a whole new form of distribution could be developed, one far more efficient, especially when working in combination with convection delivery, choosing which system works best given various influences. In delivery of food that is perishable, convection might still be necessary, but in other foods, convection would be a better method.

Security of the parcel being passed would be a key threat, but I believe various tagging and tracking could overcome with reward incentive of passing objects to keep the systems flowing.

Hope this makes sense!! :)
 
April 13, 2011, 11:48AM
Awesome idea Jessica! Best example the milk I got when I was at elementary school. From the farmers of the same village. Best milk I ever drank... so this is indeed a health issue as you're saying Sarah...

I even go a step further and building on Jessica's idea again and saying it could be an educational factor if parents send the orders with the children to school and children learn how to go choose, order, and pay. And people get a feeling when is what in season as fresh and nearby food simply tastes best.
April 13, 2011, 01:31AM
That's a great idea, Jessica. Municipalities often have a lot of public infrastructure that could be leveraged for this purpose. Given that food supply is a public health issue, it shouldn't be left up to corporations who may not be thinking of the wider interest.
April 12, 2011, 06:16PM
I think an interesting twist, in the case of supermarket resistance, would be to look at other centers for distribution which could benefit from the increased traffic: libraries or schools. These existing in almost every community and should be willing to assist. It doesn't cannibalize what they're already providing; in reality it would increase the number people who stop by.

Parents could send orders to school with their children, and pick up the groceries while they pick up their kids. Or take a family trip to the library for entertainment and shopping. I think the resistance in these venues would potentially be less.
April 11, 2011, 08:28PM
Loving the 'Back to Source' brand example. I imagine supermarket's would need some convincing on this kind of innovative inclination and case studies would help a lot with the big nudge. Way to go Jakob!
April 11, 2011, 11:24AM
Thanks for your brilliant feedback! I will do some brainstorming by combining your ideas Liz and Sarah and checking out your link Silvia. It is maybe difficult to come up with a concept as I'm aware of that big supermarket chains rather stay efficient instead of sustainable and therefore wouldn't change their strategy. I found however an example in Austria of a supermarket chain which is more popular due to its cheap prices rather than quality. Nevertheless, this chain introduced a brand called 'Back to the Source' and selling only local food from local farmers at local supermarkets. Maybe I can find some learnings from this example as well. :)
April 10, 2011, 10:33PM
Jakob, you are onto something. Have a look at this report: "Understanding Victoria's fruit and vegetables freight movements" http://www.ecoinnovationlab.com/research/food-freight/398-food-freight-understanding-victorias-fruit-and-vegetable-freight-movements

A similar analysis in QLD is applicable.
Cheers
April 10, 2011, 07:55PM
Nice idea Jakob. I think to build on Sarah's comment that there could be regional preference charts that could help establish a matrix of conscientious purchasing. For instance, in region X, there are probably only certain products that can be grown there. The chart would indicate these goods as well as the food that is specific to region Y, which would be preferable than the same goods from region Z which is further out.

In other words, how do you create a distribution system that helps address this issue of local access and awareness while providing a strategy for more conscientious purchasing along the larger distribution system?
April 10, 2011, 03:30PM
I think this is a great idea. It would help increase access to fresh food, lower emissions, and put people in closer touch with where their food comes from -- a triple win.

April 10, 2011, 07:52AM
It is an important thought. In many of the concepts alternative ways of distribution are mentioned, but it's a great idea to 'go back to the drawing board' and map it out.
April 10, 2011, 05:06AM
Great point and mapping to show it!
close

Login

Forgot my password?

New user? Sign up!