The Challenge
1023 followers
How might we better connect food production and consumption?
Concept
UPDATED: Rethinking Food Transportation (suggesting a three-step change-process)
For achieving this rethinking and implementing change successfully, we require the understanding of the holistic network behind the current situation. Below I suggest a change-process which emphasises exactly that necessity: the Multilevel Service Design Approach. By looking at the bigger picture, this approach allows the identification of underlying problem areas and enables the (re)design of better solution together with all stakeholders.Instead of delivering fresh food via central distribution centres, local distribution should be enhanced. This accounts especially for fresh products and organic farmers.
What actions would need to be taken to turn this idea into a reality?
I suggest adapting a method called Multilevel Service Design (MSD). MSD looks at the holistic picture and includes 3 stages:
1) The Holistic Network
That means looking at the whole network with all stakeholder included. By doing so, we understand why supermarkets use this form of distribution and not another one. It is crucial to understand the network behind the current service concept because if you don't look at the bigger/holistic picture, changes may not be successful. This network includes B2B (e.g. farmers-supermarket-transportation-government), B2C (e.g. supermarket-customers), and C2C (e.g. customer-customers).
2) The Distribution System Analysis
After identifying the holistic network, the system itself gets identified. That is done by analysing the Service System Architecture (visual and systematic breakdown of the whole system) and the Service System Navigation (the flows and links within the system). This is important for identifying bottlenecks within the current systems or opportunities for add-ons to make the system more efficient and effective.
3) The Distribution System Redesign
Now we have a profound understanding of the current status and can start to redesign the distribution system in that way that bottlenecks and add-ons are efficient and effective not only on the distribution system itself but for the whole network.
That means that all stakeholders get a positive outcome (increased value propositions) and therefore agree to the changes: The customer has access to fresher food and gains higher well-being; the supermarket receives less food waste, lower costs, and higher satisfaction; the farmers receive more income and recognition; the government gains lower CO2 emissions and improved economic results.
But that also means that all stakeholders need to be involved in the (re)design process! Otherwise they may not agree to the changes even though the changes would be meaningful as they may not understand/accept them.
Source: Patricio, L. et al. (2011). Multilevel Service Design: From Customer Value Constellation to Service Experience Blueprinting. Journal of Service Research, 14(2), 180-200.
1) The Holistic Network
That means looking at the whole network with all stakeholder included. By doing so, we understand why supermarkets use this form of distribution and not another one. It is crucial to understand the network behind the current service concept because if you don't look at the bigger/holistic picture, changes may not be successful. This network includes B2B (e.g. farmers-supermarket-transportation-government), B2C (e.g. supermarket-customers), and C2C (e.g. customer-customers).
2) The Distribution System Analysis
After identifying the holistic network, the system itself gets identified. That is done by analysing the Service System Architecture (visual and systematic breakdown of the whole system) and the Service System Navigation (the flows and links within the system). This is important for identifying bottlenecks within the current systems or opportunities for add-ons to make the system more efficient and effective.
3) The Distribution System Redesign
Now we have a profound understanding of the current status and can start to redesign the distribution system in that way that bottlenecks and add-ons are efficient and effective not only on the distribution system itself but for the whole network.
That means that all stakeholders get a positive outcome (increased value propositions) and therefore agree to the changes: The customer has access to fresher food and gains higher well-being; the supermarket receives less food waste, lower costs, and higher satisfaction; the farmers receive more income and recognition; the government gains lower CO2 emissions and improved economic results.
But that also means that all stakeholders need to be involved in the (re)design process! Otherwise they may not agree to the changes even though the changes would be meaningful as they may not understand/accept them.
Source: Patricio, L. et al. (2011). Multilevel Service Design: From Customer Value Constellation to Service Experience Blueprinting. Journal of Service Research, 14(2), 180-200.
Who might make a good partner for this project?
Representatives of
- major supermarket chains & logistic centres
- farmers
- government (agriculture, infrastructure, transportation, environment)
- consumers
- transportation & logistics
- service designers (public, network & infrastructure)
- infrastructure and network planners
- universities (using the knowledge and expertise of academics)
- major supermarket chains & logistic centres
- farmers
- government (agriculture, infrastructure, transportation, environment)
- consumers
- transportation & logistics
- service designers (public, network & infrastructure)
- infrastructure and network planners
- universities (using the knowledge and expertise of academics)
What suggestions would you have for potential sources of funding for the development of this project?
Government (funding for research & concept development)
University (knowledge, expertise, running the project)
Government (putting the changes into place - changes on public level)
Supermarkets (putting the changes into place - changes on private level)
University (knowledge, expertise, running the project)
Government (putting the changes into place - changes on public level)
Supermarkets (putting the changes into place - changes on private level)
20 Evaluations so far
The community is currently evaluating this concept.
Login to evaluate this concept and to see the results.
Login to evaluate this concept and to see the results.
1
How effectively do you think that this concept reconnects food consumers and producers?
| It would reconnect food consumers and producers strongly | |
| It would somewhat reconnect food consumers and producers | |
| It would not significantly reconnect food consumers and producers |
2
How scalable is this idea across communities and geographies?
| This concept can be scaled across many communities | |
| This concept will take a fair bit of work to build and scale | |
| This concept is not particularly scalable |
3
How quickly could this concept be impactful?
| This concept could happen today | |
| This concept could happen soon with some work | |
| I struggle to see this happening in a reasonable timeframe |
4
How original is this concept?
| This concept is extremely original | |
| This concept has some original aspects | |
| This concept already exists |
5
Overall, how do you feel about this concept?
| This concept rocked my world – it’s brilliant | |
| I liked this concept but preferred others | |
| This concept didn’t get me overly excited |
Comments
April 27, 2011, 03:35AM
Louise Wilson's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
May 25, 2011, 04:53PM
May 12, 2011, 03:56AM
Michael Stillwell's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
May 17, 2011, 12:07AM
Louise Wilson's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
May 25, 2011, 04:50PM
May 20, 2011, 01:53AM
May 16, 2011, 09:56PM
May 13, 2011, 08:29AM
Jakob Trischler's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
May 13, 2011, 08:54AM
Janet Gunter's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
May 13, 2011, 06:04PM
May 13, 2011, 09:20AM
May 01, 2011, 07:59AM
Jakob Trischler's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
May 02, 2011, 07:38AM
Johan Löfström's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
May 02, 2011, 07:51AM
April 10, 2011, 06:55PM
Samantha Harmon's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
April 29, 2011, 07:26PM
Sarah Fathallah's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
April 29, 2011, 07:41PM
Jakob Trischler's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
May 02, 2011, 07:39AM
April 29, 2011, 07:30PM
April 29, 2011, 02:49PM
April 28, 2011, 11:59AM
Jakob Trischler's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
April 28, 2011, 11:02PM
April 27, 2011, 03:35AM
April 27, 2011, 02:37AM
April 26, 2011, 10:25PM
Jakob Trischler's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
April 27, 2011, 02:14AM
April 13, 2011, 12:13PM
Kaushik Eshwar's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
April 13, 2011, 12:20PM
Jakob Trischler's reply to Stacy Anderson's comment
April 26, 2011, 10:11PM
April 25, 2011, 03:27AM
April 13, 2011, 11:48AM
April 13, 2011, 01:31AM
April 12, 2011, 06:16PM
April 11, 2011, 08:28PM
April 11, 2011, 11:24AM
April 10, 2011, 10:33PM
April 10, 2011, 07:55PM
April 10, 2011, 03:30PM
April 10, 2011, 07:52AM
April 10, 2011, 05:06AM

New here?







