Challenge phases Main content User comments Concept's statistics and author info Related themes, inspirations and concepts Share concept Shallenge activity feed Footer links
Login

The Challenge

1373 followers

How might we restore vibrancy in cities and regions facing economic decline? Read the challenge brief

Concept

ShareFair; On- and Offline Rent, Swop, and Share Fair

ShareFair increases people’s access to products by facilitating (peer2peer) renting, swopping and sharing. Everybody can start offering their products, vacuum cleaners, drills, land mowers, cars, everything, on- and offline to neighborhood peers.

This concept makes use of what is available, not focusing on what is missing. Within cities / communities in (economic) decline, people might have less and less buying power, but that does not mean that there are less products available for people to use, enjoy and experience.

ShareFair increases people’s access to products by facilitating (peer2peer) renting, swopping and sharing. Everybody can start offering their products, that they do not need at all times; think of vacuum cleaners drills, land mowers, cars, everything. And, people can make an extra buck with it; everybody can start their own ‘rent shop’ on- and/or offline and start making money with the products they already own. People can enjoy all kinds of products, without having to buy, own and store them. Next to that this system can initiate entrepreneurship on many different levels.

There will be two ways people can meet to negotiate the ‘deal’; online (website / smartphone app) or physical (at market places). Within this concept I focus on online offering of goods. 

Transportation

In case the deal is made online extra transportation services can be organized to get the products where they have to be and after use, to take it back. Bike trucks; bikes with some storing space can take around all the products within a certain neighborhood or block. As people search for products close by, distances can never be far.

Increasing trust between users

At physical (market) places people meet in person, which might increase trust. At these meeting places people can rent, swop and share all their hardware.

Online trust is created by feedback; think of ‘power users’, 'power renters' and 'power lenders'. For example stars can be earned when people lent or rented out many products. Also badges or printed out 'proof' can increase trust when people meet each other in person. Products can also be numbered (serial numbers that are punched in) or maybe RFID tags can secure products as then you can track them down. 

Deposits can help to secure people taking back the item as well. The deposit can be high initially (for example 70% of the price in the store), but after some time, when people have shown the right behavior (after lending 5 times through ShareFair) the deposit can be lowered to, let's say 20% - 50%. 

The 'safety' page on http://www.couchsurfing.org/safety, show some rules how to increase trust and decrease misuse.  The more information of a user is available, the more he/she shows him- or herself, the more he/she can be trusted.

Apps to find the closest renter

Smartphone apps (see picture #2 for an example) can be used to facilitate searching at locations and to notify users when there is interest in using their products. For example, when someone is looking for using a drill for a couple of days; a website or an app can assist in finding the closest renting or sharing offer. In case of an app, a (text) message can be send to the owner in order to notify him about the current interest. Immediately the owner can communicate whether the product is available and when the product can be collected. This decreases the need of planning. 

The costs and the benefits to lend/rent

Currently many people buy a certain, sometimes using it only for a couple of hours during its entire lifetime (think of a drill which is used in average 2 hours in its entire life). By renting it out it can be used by many people; for a day, a weekend or week. Using it costs only a couple of bucks. I expect that a drill can be rented out for $1 to $5 a day. When renting it out people can earn back their investment. 

Entrepreneurs can facilitate the sharing of other peoples’ products or can start an online stores by posting pictures of their products. Craftsmen (e.g. carpenters) can also earn an extra buck quite easily by utilizing their equipment (e.g. wood crafting tools) in another way. When products are difficult to utilize it might be wise to rent people's knowledge or skills along with product itself. Think of a bulldozer or something like that, which can only be operated safely when people are skilled. 

Most products are available in people’s houses or sheds, but it is not common to share them. When it can be organized in a safe way, by registering users and by providing insurances, people can buy usage time, which is far less than the entire product. The engagement of the local community to swop, rent out or share their products instead of buying and selling them is crucial for the success of the service. It should be clear that dealing with products this way is just as good as owning or buying it.

Finally the environmental aspect should nog be underestimated as this concept saves many unnecessarily bought items to be produced. We increase usage, decrease production. At the same time we increase money transfers or perception of wealth. Now it becomes interesting to buy and produce long lasting, durable products instead of cheap ones. The longer the user phase (looking at the entire life cycle), the more efficient we deal with our resources. And, the bigger the chance becomes of earning back the initial price it has been bought for. 

So, why this concept restores vibrancy in cities?

· There is more financial traffic between people and the concept triggers other (transport and insurance) services. Social or local currencies can be combined if needed or necessary

· People can make an extra buck by renting out the products they have but not use often

· People will keep getting access to all kinds of products, which might make them feel wealthy or secure in a way. People will understand that being poor does not mean that most products are out of their reach

· More people meet each other; People will experience that together they can change the current way of owning and buying products, which stimulates social cohesion

· Less products have to be manufactured while the effective usage time of products increases. This is environmentally a very good development as we are making use of our products and recourses much more efficiently.


Interesting organisations to learn from are:

www.couchsurfing.com 

www.nextdoor.com

www.rentcycle.com

www.gehuurdindebuurt.nl

www.zipcar.com

www.ecomodo.com

What resources (money, time, people, technology, etc) will your concept need to be successful?

Organizing the service online is expected to be cheaper and more promising in terms of scalability. Nevertheless, in the early phase, to increase trust, I expect that organizing off-line meetings would be smart.

A (community) website can be quite elaborate. A stylish website with a unique look and feel and costs around $5000 – $30.000 to make and I expect yearly $5000 to maintain. Simple community websites can be used at first to start creating the first ShareFair communities. This does not have to cost that much.

In case we organize one online and one physical meeting place for about 2000 – 10.000 users we need promotional tools, ambassadors spreading the word, an office, a ShareFair location. When let's say 2-3 people work on this part time, the first year will cost $50.000 – $100.000. But, i do believe that such a system can be implemented at lower costs.

Insurances and transportation are challenges for safe distribution and usage. This is why it could be wise to partner up with an insurance and/or transport company to bring in the right skills and knowledge. The organizers should organize meetings with organization for collaboration.

Within 3 months the concept could be made stronger and applied on one particular location (e.g. a neighborhood in Greece). 2 to 3 months for making the website and thinking of the strategy to involve people. Within the second half a year (monthly) physical events can be organized in order to explain the idea and to practice with the activities. The event is not to sell products and is not about a barter market only, but is to stimulate sharing, renting and swopping. Physical meetings might be necessary to change this mindset of not having to own stuff, but that it is about using stuff. This might take some time.
For these events a location (simple empty building) is needed and people should be aware of the events, so this includes spreading the word through social media and folders (door2door). Neighborhood organizations (ambassadors) should be involved to reach the users.

In order to make money with the service itself it might be interesting to ask for a fee for every ‘deal’ that involves money; so only the renting deals. The organization may ask for 20% of the renting fee. This way the website and organizing staff can be maintained in the future. The service can be profitable by itself. Fro example; when someone rents out a land mower, the lender pays $5 a day. The organization takes $1 automatically. This is possible when the payment is done online.
Another option maybe to manage the deposits. When there are large amounts of cash held by the organization, it might be interesting to do something with it, like investing it. More research needed.
Another source of income can be advertisements. Maybe even of the power renters themselves. People might pay for their products to end up on top of the list.
Another option is maybe for people to earn points when they rent out a lot. These can be reimbursed or something.
After some time, when the Walmart or MediaMarket notice a decline in sales; they might start offering their products for rent as well! This will change everything and more scenario planning is needed, but this will lead to a revolution in how we use our things. Renting, leasing and buying might go into each other. What happens then is that these organizations only rent our high quality products as these can be rented out many more times as low quality ones (that break down and ask for higher maintenance). In this case people in cities / communities in economic decline will be the first to use only high quality products. A step back (or aside) sometimes enables us to take a giant leap forward!

What steps could you take to implement this idea today?

I believe it is wise to start small; in one community, in one neighborhood. The service has to be organized and communicated.

First steps are:

• Start a simple website to spread the word and where people can become a member. In the simplest form, it can be a Facebook page. Or a NING website, which is suitable for community building.
• Search for a suitable starting location and appoint ‘ambassadors’ on a local, neighborhood level. Let them promote the project by informing neighbors. Have promotion material ready for them to use/spread
• Use Facebook and other social media tools to explain the idea and connect to people that support the cause, start building a community with believers

We can already start communicating that we do not have to own all of these products per se. That we can share our stuff (instead of keeping everything for ourselves); saving and earning money, living space and last but not least; saving the environment as we are producing less products.

The website and social pages should explain that we are able to enjoy each other’s products. And if people use the system in a smart way; we can have access to all products in the world, making extra money with the products we already own. The website or FB-page might be named; SharingisCaring.com or ShareFair.com or shareware.com (haven't checked the availability).

In short, I think it can be implemented today by start mobilizing a critical mass and start small teams on a neighborhood level that support the cause and spread the word. It might take some time to change the mindset of people as at this point in most cases owning/buying a product is perceived to be better than renting or borrowing it. Appointed local ambassadors (that might start their own renting, swopping, sharing ‘shop’) should inform their neighbors.

How can your idea be scaled so that it's implemented in cities around the world?

The website should be usable locally; on a neighborhood, village or city level. The back end of such a website can easily be made scalable. Active users or early adapters can initiate a community on the website and start their (semi-) closed ShareFair environment themselves.
As there are not many physical elements necessary the idea can be initiated quite easily. It needs some attention and success story for people to understand that making more efficient use of existing products is indeed possible and profitable. When there are people acknowledging the opportunity of this, it might go fast.

My Virtual Team


Great contributions come from:
Gijsbert Koren
Tejas Shah
Johan Löfström
Peter Marshall
Simon Morfit

Thanks!

1

How well does this concept restore vibrancy to cities and regions facing economic decline?

This concept will definitely restore vibrancy to struggling cities
This concept has potential to restore vibrancy to struggling cities
This concept will not restore vibrancy to struggling cities
2

How scalable is this concept across struggling cities and regions worldwide?

This concept could be scaled for impact across multiple locations
This concept will take a fair bit of work to build and scale
This concept is not particularly scalable
3

Does this concept require a lot of resources (time, money, people, etc) to achieve impact?

Not really – few resources would be needed to get results
Somewhat – significant resources would be needed to get results
Yes – considerable resources would be needed to get results
4

How easy would it be for our community to design an early prototype of this concept?

Easy – we could start prototyping this today
A bit tricky – but we could figure it out
Not at all easy – we'd need help from outside experts on this
5

Overall, how do you feel about this concept?

It rocked my world
I liked it but preferred others
It didn't get me overly excited
1

How well does this concept restore vibrancy to cities and regions facing economic decline?

2

How scalable is this concept across struggling cities and regions worldwide?

3

Does this concept require a lot of resources (time, money, people, etc) to achieve impact?

4

How easy would it be for our community to design an early prototype of this concept?

5

Overall, how do you feel about this concept?

Comments

Join the conversation and post a comment.

January 19, 2012, 06:52PM
Thought you might be interested in this article from today's Fast Company: http://bit.ly/yvWwCn
Shaona 's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
January 30, 2012, 05:57PM
Hey Meena,
Hey Elmar,

Just came across the Swap-O-Matic on Device's site as well. http://dvice.com/archives/2012/01/the-swap-meet-o.php

The human interaction aspect of a ShareFair market space is what's most intriguing to me. An intimate way of bringing together the community. You'll see on the SOM site that the venues that are housing SOM are in the world of craft fairs, local creative gathering places. Fitting. Imagining bigger cubbies with multiple objects, grouped by category. Art supplies trading for college students (supplies/book cost def. add up) came to mind, with a station to test out different media and share feedback. The Swap-O-Matic could use the online trust system you've thoroughly laid out Elmar: User feedback, online tracking of credits (if you see SOM video there is credit system through vending machine), donations pools, similar interests groups, etc.
Shaona 's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
January 30, 2012, 05:58PM
*Dvice
Elmar Stroomer's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
February 01, 2012, 10:39AM
Hi Shaona,

Thank you for the tip and the info. It is indeed a very interesting device. Although I can imagine that it is mainly meant for awareness purposes. The design is great by the way.
I like your thinking around having bigger departments. I guess it can be something like a pawnshop. A store where people can bring there products and something like a 'librarian' handles the lending/sharing (for a small % of the fee maybe).
I also like the idea of a shared shed. I ran into projects of DroogLab, a Dutch design firm. They did a project last year in NY: http://www.drooglab.com/projects/events/open-house/

 
January 17, 2012, 06:14AM
Hey Elmar, i love your concept. The USP of your concept is in sharing resources, the concept feels simple however it needs/can bring shift in the whole lifestyle chase by our society.I feel very strongly that in order to sustain we need to look at sharing resources at community level and cut down on our consumption and industrial production level. If practiced on a large scale, the concept would have huge effect on the way we consume. And, yes like other friends have mentioned, after resources we could look at sharing time, skill and knowledge etc.

 I happened to study some small tribes in India and resource sharing is central to such communities.For example - sharing taxi fairs, house keeping ( if i am on vacation for 2 months -someone in need can stay at my place for little rent, which in turn keeps the house safe).
The big issue of trust in such communities is resolved by letting the new member be open to the rest of the community, let them prove their credentials or unfold the past, observe them for a while till the community feels comfortable.
Similarly in this case also we could give extra points if the object is returned safely and deduct points if not, the same should be accessible to the rest of the community.
Besides being a online portal, it is important that the concept allows people to meet and interact face to face, the notion of people getting
 together for this fair would keep the vibrancy alive and something to look forward to- in addition to the product.
Great thinking Elmar.
 I checked the link to ENVIU, you guys are doing great. cheers !
January 12, 2012, 03:56AM
May want to check out the peer to peer rental sites already out there like Zilok.com, Neighborgoods.net, Rentalic.com, Rent-Instead.com, etc; and consider how sharing can utilize these already developed sites and/or add value beyond what's there (after all, there's many places where they haven't reached scale yet, including Detroit).
Elmar Stroomer's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
January 12, 2012, 08:41AM
Hi Vincent, thank you for your comment. I did not know all the sites you mention. I acknowledge that there are many similar initiatives developed. What I was trying to do it to check how we can improve such systems, make them more commonly uses and how this development can change the situation of people in cities in decline.
I have the feeling that one of the reasons why all the initiatives (that I have seen) are still quite small, is because they follow a sort of Ebay manner of showing the products. A list with prices. I have the feeling that such a website is more than just getting products from some-one and start using them. People meet / help / have to trust each other in order to get their home or neighborhood out of a declining situation. And this principle, of renting and starting small ways of making money with available products, can do that. If it is done in the right way.
I am curious what you think. Unfortunately I can not add any more information in the concept itself, but I am happy to continue this conversation here.
Vincent Cheng's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
January 12, 2012, 04:46PM
Thanks for the reply Elmar.

Agreed with you that trust is key for peer 2 peer renting that involves rental, return, and maybe future rentals; even more so than p2p selling (like Cragislist & eBay) which is more of a one-time transaction. Critical local mass is also quite important to make this work & of value for both renters & rentees.

So, your focus on trying to kickstart this at a neighborhood level certainly has merit. You may be able to leverage these pre-existing rental networks to speed things up though (rather than trying to build everything from scratch), as they've put a lot of work/thought into the rental support process & technology. In fact, your community-based approach should be a key part of their promotional strategies (just like how Craigslist has a stronger neighborhood theme vs. eBay, and how Yelp did interesting things like throwing parties to build up the reviewer community in various cities).

On a different note, I believe in the future of collaborative consumption, and love your thought that these P2P efforts could also encourage companies & retailers to provide rentals, as opposed to just pushing new product sales. In fact, I submitted something along those lines to a previous OpenIDEO challenge for SONY on "How can today's technology help us make the most of our planet's resources", to nudge in that direction: http://www.openplanetideas.com/how-can-sony-technology-be-used-to-address-environmental-challenges/concepting/sonysharing-electronics-when-you-want-while-saving-money-and-resources-/
Tejas Shah's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
January 12, 2012, 05:07PM
Good point, many of these sites are still underdeveloped, while some like Zilok.com are operating successfully. I think that the aim with ShareFair was to be local and build a sense of community. Maybe we can discuss ways of differentiating ShareFair operations in addition to utilizing existing sites.

Maybe ShareFair could host collaboration hours in a community center to give people ideas, know-how, education, etc. One issue with the existing sites is that there is not always very much available for renting in a particular zip code mainly due to interest. If ShareFair could be launched around specific communities and encourage every member to participate and collaborate, traffic within a community could be specifically increased.
Melanie Kahl's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
January 16, 2012, 07:24PM
The idea of pairing it with a brick and mortar institution is great. I do think models like Neighborgoods.net are promising, but there are interesting avenues for differentiation. The workshop model is one of those avenues - reminds me of http://techshop.ws/
January 06, 2012, 06:33PM
Few ideas to build trust amongst users:

1) Building on Elmar's proposed idea of creating a ratings system, users can build their credentials and earn various titles until they reach coveted "power renter" or "power lender" titles.

2) People wishing to lend would have to specify an "equipment value," and give ShareFair a percentage of the rental fee (we can call this a deal fee). People wishing to rent would have to post security deposits (which would be a percentage fraction of the "equipment value") held by ShareFair. A required security deposit would require lenders to rent to any user since it is backed by ShareFair. This model would encourage users to interact.

2) ShareFair could implement a special pricing scheme to establish users and build ratings. New renters would have to pay double rental fees and post 100% security deposits until they reach (5) favorable ratings. First time lenders would have to give ShareFair a high percentage of the rental fee (deal fee). As users earn various trust rankings (or titles), rentals fees, security deposits, and deal fees would be reduced.

I think these ideas would encourage users to participate in this system and incentivize good behavior/proper usage. Nice concept Elmar!
Tejas Shah's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
January 06, 2012, 06:36PM
Wish I could edit my comment lol - that last numbering should be a 3)
Elmar Stroomer's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
January 06, 2012, 08:13PM
Thanks Tejas, your additions are great! These are really good ideas actually and I will add it in the concept. I really like the deposit aspect. The threshold to use the system should be kept low though, but as long as the deposit is fas less than the price of the item it would be fine.
Meena Kadri's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
January 08, 2012, 09:03PM
Nice one, Tejas! Great builds.
January 11, 2012, 12:59PM
I like how you putting some cultural anthropology to the problem. Barter system mayne.
Shyam Vijayaraghavan's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
January 11, 2012, 05:37PM
A complication to the barter system is that legally, one has to pay taxes on the bartered transaction, just as if one paid in cash. While it is difficult for the IRS to enforce this on one-off situations, An institutionalized system like this would be large enough to cause trouble.

One potential solution is to have each person estimate the value of their good or service when posting the ad / product, so the appropriate sales tax can be included in the final transaction that the website enables.
January 11, 2012, 03:45AM
hey Elmar,

Great concept! I've really enjoyed reading the branching of ideas, from a points system to manage lending and utilizing fee money to a members community online.

With the holiday season passing, I was thinking about your concept of ShareFair being applied to the many presents we all get and the many presents out of them that are stored away. So many valuable gifts such as clothing, accessories, gift cards, kitchen sets, etc that are never put to use and sit stagnant.

A city Yankee Swap-type gathering to start the new year came to mind. A way to carry over the holiday spirit in a useful way. Maybe their is pop up shop every year that holds swapping parties per category of gifts being exchanged.

I recently came across this initiative created by NYU students, MettroChange, goo.gl/N4sJz that donates leftover money on one's MetroCard by swiping at a kiosk. Imagining if there was a group of digital gift card swapping stations (say per category: restaurants, home goods, entertainment, clothing) to swap money in and out to your liking based on needs. Or community members could simply donate gift cards they will not use.

The depth of your concept has me thinking. Thanks much. Looking forward to your feedback. Best to you this new year!
December 28, 2011, 08:59PM
And in regard to your cost assumptions, I was thinking, aren't there any existing social forum with enough functionality that could be utilized and piggy-backed upon? to make your start-up-costs to a minimum (just one active administrator/moderator for the whole on-line-existance) There are some local trading-groups for toys and video games inside facebook for instance. (like a fan page or group or similar) I just mean that a simple messaging board must be enough, but with some connection with the participants online identity validated with actual home address within the city of the concept.
Maybe Carrotmob is also a place to be active at? (do you know about it?)

Maybe you should have a yearly little symbolic member fee for all users, as incentive to be honest and active, to earn that fee back as soon as possible.
Peter Marshall's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
January 05, 2012, 09:47PM
I think this idea is very promising. I really like it! Nice work! Focusing on what people currently possess instead of what they wish they possessed is definitely a helpful mindset for areas that are hoping for revitalization and suffering from economic decline.

The two trouble spots seem to be: 1. trust between user and renter 2. Liability for owner of the tool, car, etc. If ShareFair can overcome these then it can work in any community.

As you have touched on in your concept summary and the comments above, there are ways around these problems. In regards to the first problem, ZipCars does a great job of overcoming similar problems. I think using a similar style of background checks to the one ZipCars uses would be helpful for ShareFair. This way whoever uses the program has a baseline of trust: everyone using the program has passed the basic level of background checks. Then on top of the background checks, user feedback would be a helpful way for participants to build a good reputation. Much like credit scores help banks know whether they should lend to individuals or not, ShareFair's tool owners and car owners would benefit from some type of user credit. They would be able to make informed decisions about who they lend their goods to. I would bet that the current credit scores could be useful in determining who can be trusted the most in the Sharing market place. I also think some marketing on ShareFair's website about successful renting and sharing would go a long way in creating a culture among ShareFair users that helps foster trust inherently. Producing weekly featured videos of real ShareFair users who lent out their tools and got them back in great condition would help create this culture.

As for the second problem, waivers and annual fees might help, but it would be better if the community was self regulating. No owner of tools wants to share their tools and then get sued because a renter hurts themselves. Likewise, no renter wants to get a tool that could malfunction and cause injury. I think every owner would need to have some sort of waiver where the renter signs off, but it would also help if every owner made a short informative video for their renter. In the video the owner could demonstrate a tool test that each renter should practice before operating the tool. For a drill the owner might demonstrate basic functions and then test the drill by drilling 5 holes and 5 screws. This demonstration and test would encourage safe tool use and hopefully help users from getting injured in the first place. Before renting, this type of video would need to be watched by the renter.
Elmar Stroomer's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
January 06, 2012, 08:02PM
Thank you Peter, you touched indeed the 2 spots that need some attention, but surely can be solved. I do not know Zipcars, but I will look into it. Another organisation I like is www.couchsurfing.com. People that are travelling can search for people willing to share their couch or a spare room. It is very personal as people will invite strangers into their homes. They solve it by showing the community. Showing faces and success stories will increase trust. I will include your commens in the conceit
Elmar Stroomer's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
January 06, 2012, 08:06PM
The comment box was acting weird. Well, interesting tips and tricks can be found here: http://www.couchsurfing.org/safety.
As for your second comment. There can be interesting peer2peer insurance products in it for insurance companies. An easier way is to have both parties check a box stating that they carry the risk of using/renting out themselves. I will includethis in the concept. Thanks agin!
January 05, 2012, 08:59PM
Elmar, congrats on your Top 20 concept! The advisory panel really enjoyed your focus on the positive resources and assets of a community, rather than on what it might be lacking. During Refinement, let's think about what might be learnt from other existing P2P networks, eg. Kickstarter, AirBNB, Craigslist, etc. Trust seems to be a big factor for all of them – what builds could support this? How might the user journey through this proposed system be visualised?
January 02, 2012, 04:57PM
Great concept, great explanations !
Thank you Elmar.
Elmar Stroomer's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
January 04, 2012, 12:02PM
Thanks!
January 04, 2012, 01:06AM
Great asset-based (as opposed to deficit-based) approach. In addition to the reasons you list, with greater access to tools/materials residents will be able to undertake more repair and beautification projects in their homes and neighborhoods - thereby revitalizing their cities.
Elmar Stroomer's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
January 04, 2012, 12:01PM
Thank you for that addition. Also, when it is easy and common to have access to all kinds of tools, people get ideas what to do with them. Maybe I can add this still in the refinement.
January 04, 2012, 01:16AM
This concept also has potential to facilitate vocational training and skills building programs. With easier acces to tools/materials under- and un-employed individuals could learn new trades - e.g., carpentry or landscaping - and potentially acquire a new means of earning a livelihood.
January 02, 2012, 08:42PM
Congrats on this post being today's Featured Concept!
December 29, 2011, 10:09PM
I like this idea. I was thinking about something similar. My local library has a tool lending program that allows community members to checkout equipment for a period of time. It's a great alternative to buying expensive equipment that you may only use once. Another big plus is the community connection-- Meeting neighbors who have the knowledge to help teach you how to use the tools properly.

To push a step further, I was thinking of this as an initiator for community-based projects-- fixing the sidewalk on the local commercial street or cleaning up a community park. Also, perhaps this could be a jumping off point for reclamation projects. I thought this was a great idea http://www.openideo.com/open/vibrant-cities/concepting/reclaimed-in-detroit/ And a project like tool swapping could offer another avenue to engage the community to participate.
December 28, 2011, 08:48PM
Great, with lawnmovers and snowshovels/snowblowers and heavier equipment like that, I guess that the owner/operator can be included in the deal. to make the actual work safer, and also to inspire the discussion/meeting to also include sitting down and haveing a cup of coffee.

Also for more spread of the concept and for higher off-line-awareness, the web page could have some type of templates-folders, that the more active participants can print out, in order to walk around their neighbourhood, to validate that it is legitimate that they want to lend out their tools. (for suburbs with lots of computer-illiterates) ( to prevent fraud-attempts against elderly)
Elmar Stroomer's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
December 29, 2011, 02:27PM
I think you have a very good point there. I wanted to include knowledge and skills, but at the same time I feel that the power of the concept is it's simplicity. It should look like, just borrowing someones stuff for a buck or 2, and not hiring a 'company' to do everything. But of course there are ways to keep the threshold low. I should include it in the concept. Thanks!

And for the second point; I can imagine that people get suspicious. It sounds also that the system is easy to fool. Renting something and never take it back. Passes, registrations, personal numbers, printed out proofs may prevent that.

Johan Löfström's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
December 29, 2011, 02:48PM
Your comment made me think of those engraving machines, that you could rent at your lock-smiths to engrave ID-nrs onto your bike-frame and car stereo. The concept could have regular meetings where participants could bring their power tools etc to get them registerred and engraved in a database, to enable simple reminders with automatic email or text message. when the rent period runs out.

perhaps install a late-fee, like the video rental shops? So this threat makes it popular to return the equipment as fast as possible, in order for someone else to use it. (and if more late-fees come in, this could offset and lower the initial member-fee?)

and also issue some type of ID-card, laminated, with simple info on how to validate that your neighbor really is your neighbor.

But the most appropriate would be to only lend your tools to people you have seen around your street for at least a couple of months in a row.
Johan Löfström's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
December 29, 2011, 02:53PM
For lawnmovers and snowblowers my intent was also to help elderly citizens, and those with permanent handicap or with temporary illness, like a broken bone.
Would enable some teen entrepreneurs to walk around and move several of the lawns on a regular basis in their suburban area,

(i just forgot to mention these in my first comment)
December 28, 2011, 08:09PM
Great focus on what is available over what is missing, Elmar! And we're loving your hunch to start small and build from there. We're thrilled to have someone from Enviu join us – if others want to check it out: http://www.enviu.org/
Elmar Stroomer's reply to Meena Kadri's comment
December 29, 2011, 01:58PM
Thank you Meena!
close

Login

Forgot my password?

New user? Sign up!