Challenge phases Main content User comments Concept's statistics and author info Related themes, inspirations and concepts Share concept Challenge activity feed Footer links
Login

The Challenge

1373 followers

How might we restore vibrancy in cities and regions facing economic decline? Read the challenge brief

Winning concept

UPDATED! Dialogue-Booster Park!

Dialogue Booster is a project with 15 local people That will come and play for change in their community. The team leaders will guide them thru the different phases of this 4D project where they dig deeper into the city's core and people!

I believe that in order to get something growing in a city like Detroit we need to ignite the local people, its nothing wrong with getting more companies to the city, its also good. I believe that we also need to get the locals in the loop, and this i want to do thru encounters and dialogs. With an increased number of dialogue we will have an increased number of rising ideas that have taking root between at least two persons sitting, having a dialog.


I would like to create a place in the public, intended only for dialogues.. Let us call it a dialogue-park. Here we will install dialogue-inviting seats. It could be as simple as putting out two chairs facing each other and standing beside and invite people to have a dialogue. Or we could make it bigger and create a space where we meet once or twice a week for dialogues were we are given a topic we can choose to have a dialogue around or not.


When putting out set topics for dialogues we should be aware of that its not the outcome that is of most importance, its the process during the dialogue that makes us to connect to another person that is more important, this will in the end create more vibrancy. The outcome is secondary and its also important to be curious of the outcome and examine it and see what was created and if we can harvest something from it.





Below you can read about one way this concept could be developed that is a bit far from and more complicated then the original concept of the Dialogue park. And I am a bit late with Updating this concept with all the input I got from so many people. so with only 2 days left of the evaluation-phase I feel its not fair to all the people that voted so far to totally change the concept - therefore I would like to leave the original concept as it is and below here you can read about one of many Ideas that the dialogue park raised in my head..


01 /
Engage in projects with optimism

02 /
Work with people of different perspectives and backgrounds

03 /
Ask questions and listen for the needs of the end user

04 /
Search for hidden insights in conversations

05 /
Look broad and wide for initial inspiration

06 /
Develop many ideas and don’t be precious with them

07 /Think big, start small, scale fast

08 /
Nurture failure and mistakes

09 /
Allow processes to produce outcomes

10 /
Work quick and dirty to try many iterations of an idea

11 /Prototype

12 /Implement


The 12 steps above describes how this project could unfold.

This concept is an attempt to help people help themselves and rise from the hopelessness that they may find themselves in when the city and surroundings have reached this stage of economic decline.


It is important that new ideas and initiatives are well anchored with the local residents, and that they feel ownership for the change that may come. it is after all the local people we want to reach.


Dialogue booster is a project that aims in the long run to increase communication between people, and contribute to a positive change in the city in various creative ways. Dialogue booster is a touring workshop / project that installs itself in the cities that may need some startup help to get started to begin to create something that will help them and their neighbors to improve their environment.


Dialogue booster will be facilitate by two team ledars that works with helping and guiding a team of local residents with different background.


We invite people to apply to join our "design team" of 15 local residents from different backgrounds. The team will together with the Team Leaders from Dialogue Booster work in x number of months to dig deeper into what the city might need, by examining its history and people thru different processes, interactive exhibitions and workshops.

In a way one can compare this project with Openideo.com but to do it with 15 local residents that uses the local city and its inhabitants as laboratorium. If they need more data, they simply asks people of the city or invite them to a process or workshop.


Dialogue Booster team leaders will provide the design team with tools, rules and roles and inspiration. To get a kickstart in their project, their first task will be to Facilitate a "dialogue-park" for 1 day, where they invite people from the city to chat in small groups around given topics. The Design team also has the task of harvesting the discoveries which they find in the different groups and bring them back to home base to share and build a foundation from, for their coming work.


During the months the design team will work together, the team leaders will guide them through the four phases of the 4-D model which is

Discover - Appreciating and valuing the best of What Is. Information and stories are gathered about what is working well.

Dream - Envisioning What Might Be. How do we want things to be for the future?

Design - Determining What Should Be. How can we move from where we are now to this vision of the future that we have created? How can we put the ideas into practice? Who will be involved?

Deliver (or Destiny) - Innovating What Will Be. In this phase, practical strategies or projects are put into practice and space created for ideas to flow and develop. There is an emphasis on empowering and encouraging people to take action and carry forward their own ideas.


(Source 4D model & Appreciative Inquiry;

http://bjseminars.com.au/our-approach/appreciative-inquiry/the-4-d-cycle/

http://www.mdf.nl/page/MDF-GENERAL/Information-centre/Tools/Appreciative-Inquiry

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appreciative_inquiry)


These phases will each last a couple of weeks so that the design team will have plenty of time to create workshops and installations that include the local people to contribute with their knowledge.


the team leaders will have a frame for how the process will unfold but what will be painted on the canvas will differ for every city. what will be painted in Detroit is what especially Detroit needs.

with this metaphor I mean that we will have the project time line worked out and all the tools to help the design team move forward thru the different phases in the project, but what they will create together is not set.


thru this concept we will incorporate local people to Create within their local community and help them self to create the change that they want. This could result in new companies, new meeting places, new or old ideas that come true. By having a core group of 15 people (that we call the design team) we can have a close group that will work with out any interruptions. At the same time there 15 people will do workshops, installations and research that will reach far more people that will be involved in the project as a 2nd layer.


Inspiration:

http://www.designingdublin.com/

http://www.design21c.com/

http://www.kaospilot.dk/

http://www.slideshare.net/designingdublin/love-the-city-spectacle?from=ss_embed


What resources (money, time, people, technology, etc) will your concept need to be successful?

I think we need to start a company or organization that runs this project. we will need funding for salary for the team leaders, Rent for office space in the city, Compensation for the people in the design team, Funding that covers cost for materials, office, prtining etc.

Maybe we can get companies in the region to go together and create a fund for this procejt to use for social change in the city!

We would also need to find competent people to hire as teamledaers ( I know some people! ;)


How can your idea be scaled so that it's implemented in cities around the world?

This Idea is already scalable, from the organization that we create we can create collaborations with local authorizes and business that want to invest in change in their local communities. after that we can just do they same project over and over again and help cities help them self.

How can your idea be scaled so that it's implemented in cities around the world?

This can as you can imagine be scaled very very easily! We could also an online community where we share our knowledge of creating dialogs for the purpose of a more vibrant city. and maybe a dummie 1-2-3-guide for making your own dialogue park. In the future we could also install dialog spaces that links the cities together so you can have a global dialog, local between for example Detroit and Shanghai or why not a similar city in Russia. This could be seen as a mixture between art and dialogs, where you have a camera capturing you with the background and a gigantic screen showing this in the other place and vice versa. This will also create vibrancy passively to other people passing by seeing what’s going on.

My Virtual Team

no one named no one forgotten. Thanks for all comments and inputs! you know who you are!

What resources (money, time, people, technology, etc) will your concept need to be successful?

Free time. Stong will. Curious people. at least two chairs.

What steps could you take to implement this idea today?

This concept can be put together very easily. It depends on which level we want to implement it on. but if we should do it today, we should just bring a bunch of chairs down to the park and invite the local media and ignite the social media about it to attract people to have dialogues

Evaluation Results

1

How well does this concept restore vibrancy to cities and regions facing economic decline?

This concept will definitely restore vibrancy to struggling cities
This concept has potential to restore vibrancy to struggling cities
This concept will not restore vibrancy to struggling cities
2

How scalable is this concept across struggling cities and regions worldwide?

This concept could be scaled for impact across multiple locations
This concept will take a fair bit of work to build and scale
This concept is not particularly scalable
3

Does this concept require a lot of resources (time, money, people, etc) to achieve impact?

Not really – few resources would be needed to get results
Somewhat – significant resources would be needed to get results
Yes – considerable resources would be needed to get results
4

How easy would it be for our community to design an early prototype of this concept?

Easy – we could start prototyping this today
A bit tricky – but we could figure it out
Not at all easy – we'd need help from outside experts on this
5

Overall, how do you feel about this concept?

It rocked my world
I liked it but preferred others
It didn't get me overly excited

Comments

Join the conversation and post a comment.

January 19, 2012, 11:15PM
Congratulations jens, great concept - I can't wait to see what this might become!
Jens Mortensen's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
December 11, 2011, 07:14PM
yeah, similarity in gathering, and my idea is to have dialogs, not arguing back and forth. for me its important that we can build on each others thoughts and ideas and not put energy on alienating discussions like convince that something is a bad idea.
Mamta Gautam's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
January 19, 2012, 08:07AM
Hey Jens,I came across this amazing example of a park which not only ads vibrancy but takes care of flash flooding locally in Sao -paulo

http://inhabitat.com/green-stream-linear-park-vibrant-new-public-space-in-sao-paulo-could-help-alleviate-flash-flooding/
There is so more that can be fixed while dialogue boosting , cheers to you concept . best of luck !!
January 15, 2012, 08:13PM
Wow – great to check out the builds on your concept, Jens – taking in and extending so much collaborative feedback here. Nice one!
January 12, 2012, 07:14PM
I really appreciate the fundamental simplicity of your idea, Jens. It's a low cost intervention (both monetarily and even personal investment) that has the power to create meaningful (and not so meaningful...but maybe fun) connections. And the layer of storytelling and communication that could exist on top of this platform (i.e., website, blog, etc.) could capture the life of the project and excite others to be a part.

I know it's not immediately relevant, but a similar type of project that I think got a lot of publicity in its day was 'Play Me I'm Yours' (http://www.streetpianos.com/), placing pianos in public spaces and bringing people together to both play and enjoy.

Anyway. Nice, simple, understandable concept. Regardless of what happens, I think you should try to roll this out in a few choice spots and record what happens. It's good for research on people and how they behave and would definitely generate some powerful stories.
January 14, 2012, 01:49AM
This is a really interesting idea! I love it's simplicity and how easy it would be to implement. I also agree that it is really important to create a space for a community to be involved in restoring their city as most often the people who live there know best what sort of changes need to happen. This concept could also work well in conjunction with a lot of the other concepts as a way to identify whats kinds of new businesses, spaces, etc. the community wants.
January 13, 2012, 12:53PM
How about discussing with public transportation companies to paint a couple of seats on their buses as the designated "Dialog-seats"? :)

I was just thinking about trains that are labeled with "silent" and "no mobile phone talking in this carriage". And think the opposite could also be useful to "Label" with some extra bright colourful textiles or cushions?
Anne-Laure Fayard's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
January 13, 2012, 01:02PM
Nice one Johan and indeed, why not label seats for conversation or dialogue.
Vincent Cheng's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
January 13, 2012, 02:56PM
Absolutely!
January 07, 2012, 12:06AM
Kind of cool, but I have dialogues with my friends all day long and to be honest, who doesn't prefer having dialogues with people familiar and in some way inspiring than with some random person.
People would otherwise have dialogues in the tube or in a cafe too, there are plenty of informal spaces in the city already...

That is to say that while I like your idea, I would prefer, if there was more to it than "just two chairs". Maybe there could be certain rules to the dialogue (a time-slot?), or a certain setting, such as for instance at speaker's corner in Hyde Park. Because isn't the idea that people who would normally NOT speak to each other would get a stage to talk?

I believe that the setting should lower the fear of engaging by reduce the perceived "risk" of getting stuck with someone obnoxious (or too challenging, too "different") for too long. Also, by following a certain format, the dialogues could be captivating and inspiring to an audience too.
Jens Mortensen's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
January 11, 2012, 10:06AM
Thank you Korinna! You have some very good points in your comment! and it shows that you have visualized the concept and seen the weaknesses that if probably would have in practice.

I will definatly tak in your input when I Refine the concept today.
Vincent Cheng's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
January 11, 2012, 08:59PM
Great builds Korinna to push this concept so it effectively encourages dialogue better than existing public places. And am eager to see your refinements Jens =)
Laura Espiau's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
January 12, 2012, 12:25PM
Hi! I like very much your concept of devoting a place for dialogue Jens; it is simple and points to the essential. But I agree with Korinna in the sense that maybe people who are not used to connect or speak with other random people, will not feel attracted to it; and that already curious people who use to dialogue with strangers, have already the opportunity to do it in public spaces. I understand that the point of your concept is to encourage and boost these potential connections by setting a specific space for them, but maybe it would make sense to promote also connections within those who wouldn’t probably go ‘by themselves’ to that space.

So here I write a couple of ideas. There could be ‘dialogue spots’ in places where people have to be together and cannot “escape”. For example, airports, doctor’s waiting room, public administration offices, etc There could be couples of chairs with a set of kind of instructions for dialogue, like a notebook with suggested discussion issues, a box for comments and proposals... Maybe there could be at the beginning of the project some dialogue agents (volunteers) who could tour between those spaces (waiting rooms, etc) to dynamize and encourage people to use the dialogue spots. Hope it helps : )
Katarzyna 's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
January 12, 2012, 10:45PM
Love this idea! Another great space to engage with a dialogue booster - the elevator! Could be done through a funny audio guide, making two or more riders laugh together, possibly talking together. Similarly in more public spaces - introducing humor can make for a great ice breaker in conversation, giving the two strangers something shared to talk about. I hope this proposal spreads far and wide :)
Anne-Laure Fayard's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
January 13, 2012, 01:11PM
Hi, I agree with several of the comments above on the fact that while the idea is simple and strong, it might not be enough to put two chairs in a park and labeled it a dialogue park.
The concept can be strong but it has to be developed so that interactions are encouraged, triggered and cultivated.
One option is indeed to use public spaces where some of these interactions might happen, or where people have time to kill, to create such conversations. It is indeed like an elevator or while you're waiting at the copier machine or the coffee machine, in an organization, people have to stand, they are idle and they often tend to chat. Another option is to also provide triggers for conversation. I was just trying to imagine myself going to a dialogue spot and having to speak with someone I don't know, about I don't know what. It will be awkward and difficult. Providing themes, data (e.g. the infographics of Amanda's concept, a summary of a new project), or even a speaker to start the conversation and manage it, are all options to consider. Having also a way to record the conversation like white boards in waiting room or elevator where you can just write something if you're alone or put a comment summarizing your discussion with someone might be a good way to trigger conversations and share knowledge.
January 13, 2012, 11:30AM
This is such a simple, yet powerful idea. I've noticed that when people bump into each other at common community locations such s supermarkets, they tend to chat for at least five minutes. This form of communication could maybe be used to spread information about what's going on in the city. Maybe if there were a simple cheap cork bulletin board between or above two chairs located at one of these common locations, people could put up flyers for events or job listings, or maybe even universities looking for research participants (often for monetary rewards). This could generate more conversation and lead to a greater awareness of what's going on in the city.
December 09, 2011, 08:45AM
Oh this is really a fun idea!
Peter Marshall's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
January 06, 2012, 12:11AM
Jens, great idea! Simple communication and conversation is central to community and connection.

As another option you could also set up 10 chairs at a farmer's market and have a timer that goes off every 5 or 10 minutes. People sit down at any empty chair and start talking to other people. The timer would help with the awkward entry and exit to conversation and the chairs would offer a place for people who want to talk to sit down and do so. It'd be like a conversation market to get people connected.

Thanks for your idea.
Jens Mortensen's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
January 11, 2012, 10:08AM
Thank you Peter! I think that this concept is growing into a moving workshop that can work as a starter for these communities to become more vibrant and create more shared visions together.
January 12, 2012, 08:06AM
a concept as somple as Free Hugs and much better than the Speakers Corner : ) as it involves talking and not shouting at each other.
Actually it reminds me a little the well known Python sketch "The Arguement Clinic" - It's fresh and good for your health.
January 12, 2012, 04:18AM
Jens, I think this initiative will fit well in the DISCOVER stage of the Appreciative Inquiry process you shared. At the same time, it should take care to not make it too structured. There's a certain organic serendipity that should be encouraged for great conversations to take place. The results of what you find out will help you decide the future steps.

Also see this short talk by Dan Ariely on conflicts of interest http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_ariely_beware_conflicts_of_interest.html
May not be directly relevant, but I think it's a cautionary note all of us should keep in mind in terms of how we might unconsciously affect the nature of the finding with an existing hypothesis in mind.
January 10, 2012, 08:13PM
I wonder if this could be combined with training in critical thinking, logic and better ways of communicating...

I apologize for not being able to find the actual study, but, I read a study a while back that scanned people's brains as they listened to ideas they agreed with and ideas they disagreed with.

While listening to ideas they liked, the emotional centers of their brain were more likely to be activated. While listening to ideas they didn't like, the critical thinking areas of their brain were more likely to be active. In other words, we seem to be better at tearing apart and thinking critically of ideas that we dislike than we are at thinking critically about ideas we like (even though, on the surface, we are sure we like them because they make perfect sense).

Since part of this project's goal is to get a variety of people talking to each other, it may benefit from teaching them how to both make logical arguments as well as to evaluate arguments logically. This would help to avoid situations where people are talking at each other (simply because they don't like what the other side is saying) rather than dialoguing with each other (and truly engaging in a conversation).
Jens Mortensen's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
January 11, 2012, 09:52AM
Tahnk you Jessica! This is very interesting! I have done a similar experiment (but without scanning my brain with machines! hehe.) And its true that its often much easier to talk about what we are unhappy with or dislike. In process like the dialog booster its important to be aware of this. One way to do it is to let people collaborate in a workshop where they try a "negative brainstorming" where the purpose is toy opened the brain and just let go and be negative a lot. and often something good comes from this. We could also let people play the devils advocate on each other to be aware of how it feels when someone is negative.

When I attended the Kaospilot school design school we often made rules to keep the dialogs in a "Build-on" spirit. don't put focus on what you don't like, put your focus in what you like instead. and also as one of my teachers (Kristin Birkeland) once said "Don't be interesting, Be interested"
Jessica Rudder's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
January 11, 2012, 05:23PM
"Don't be interesting, Be interested" - I love this. It could be the motto of the parks since the purpose is to speak with one another, not impress each other with how cool you are or the crazy thing that happened last week or anything else of that nature. It's a good motto to have outside of a dialogue park (and one I can benefit from as I am not as good of a listener as I hope to one day be).
January 11, 2012, 11:03AM
Cool idea, Jens! Maybe have principles written (or displayed in some other creative way), like in Open Space. Like: whoever comes is the right people. Or: whenever it ends, it ends.
It can inspire people to approach the dialogue booster with an open mindset, so they are willing to go in and just see what happens. I think that when you enter with too heavy expectations, it can hinder the dialogue.
January 05, 2012, 09:28PM
Cheers for your Top 20 concept Jens! The advisory panel was excited to think about the possibilities for community connection and conversation through this concept. We encourage you and everyone to consider how you might experiment with this during Refinement and report back to us what happened!
Jens Mortensen's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
January 11, 2012, 10:10AM
Thank you guys! I saw this very late because I was busy traveling the world and meet different people! but now I have at least a couple of hours to take in all the good comments that the concept got and refine it for the next step!
January 10, 2012, 01:15PM
Shared culture: I am reminded of the phenomenon reported in the early 2000s, where people wearing iPods were reported recognised each other with the white headphones and exchanged their music for a while. A shared context is critical to kickstarting the process of dialogue in strangers. To get the 'locals in the loop' as Jens mentions in a place like Detroit, you can look at its shared history around automobiles - with something similar around the theme of 'car stories', where older people can share their experiences / memories related to cars with younger people. A creative execution of this could be 4 car seats facing each other with steering wheels making a makeshift centrepiece :-)

Shared space: Building on Catherine's comment, another perspective of the ‘together, but alone’ psychology is in crowded cities in India like Mumbai, Bangalore etc. The bubble of personal space functions almost as a survival mechanism here. In such places, you could extend the 'chairs facing each other' concept to shared places like: Chairs arranged in a circle around common spaces where the need to discuss is the most. For example: to discuss a film just after stepping out from a movie theatre.
Meena Kadri's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
January 10, 2012, 10:34PM
Great collaborative input, Advait!
Jens Mortensen's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
January 11, 2012, 09:35AM
Advait, Thats a great build-on you got there, We should totally take care of all the knowledge the crowd in Detroit already have. I got a fear of that there is a lot of frustration and disappointness buried in these cultures that is a rest of the automobile industry and therefore I think its really important to keep the dialogs forward-thinking and with an focus on appreciative inquiry, perhaps with a help of Non violent communication.
January 07, 2012, 04:41AM
I’m especially drawn to this concept as a vehicle for storytelling, creating connections between strangers, and opening them up to something/someone outside their day-to-day trajectory and experience. Efforts to stimulate connections such as these are crucial in addressing our increased isolation in the US. But, I venture, it will require a trigger to burst the bubble of personal space, and break out of the ‘together, but alone’ psychology so many people have become accustomed to here in the States.

What could be helpful is a draw (or, perhaps, a ‘starter gimmick’): possibly the chair pairings are part of a larger event (like the always popular photo booth)? Or, participants are given written tidbits of stories to collect and exchange, scavenger-hunt style? I’ve had success in past projects asking folks to simply relate a food story or memory (what was the first dish you learned to cook? Who taught you?). Or, perhaps the dialogue is moveable: jump on a train or trolley (or question contributors there), and engage in a brief back-and-forth (assisted by cue cards or topics, or similar) with a stranger, but it only has to last until the next stop. In short, offer people something they want, or something that piques their interest, give them a reason to share, and the dialog will follow.

I personally feel strongly that a great way to cement the connections created and amplify the voices sharing is to capture it all: document and archive the stories and exchange to create a living narrative that you can build upon and showcase, spurring more conversation and inspiring others to do the same...
Meena Kadri's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
January 08, 2012, 09:11PM
Great builds, Catherine! Jens: if there's any feedback that you're keen on – be sure to incorporate it into your actual concept post by mid-week so that you're all set for the Evaluation round.
Whitney Quesenbery's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
January 09, 2012, 02:38PM
I love the idea of creating "casual" spaces for quick interactions. One way to think about fostering unlikely conversations might be to think about where to place them - places where people wait (like near the TKTS booth, or bus stops), places where people choose to linger (like NYC greenspace project that uses traffic islands and odd corners of the city).

Do they need to be visually striking, so that they are identified by their appearance?

Could they turn into meeting places: "I'll see you at Name That Spot" (the way I might meet someone at the fountain in Washington Square Park).

What could their function be for people visiting a neighborhood, or in tourist areas?
December 07, 2011, 09:58PM
I like the way you've suggested a book or website which could celebrate what might be achieved by this simple initiative. Oh – and I thought you might enjoy this experiment by a buddy of mine in London: http://superflux.in/work/yellowchair-stories It has a different focus to what you're proposing here but is a great example of someone who proposed something like this and actually went out and did it.
Meena Kadri's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
December 07, 2011, 10:52PM
Glad you liked it, Jens. Anab is a real winner. And remember – there's nothing to stop folks prototyping ideas they're proposing here on OpenIDEO. Could be great to do a simple trial of what you're suggesting!
Adriana Valdez Young's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
December 28, 2011, 12:01AM
I love the simplicity of your vision!

Seeing two chairs as the basic building blocks of community is powerful, scalable and can mutate to match the street furniture.

The seats could graft onto existing infrastructure, such as bus stops, fire hydrants, fences and other public spaces where the built form may not invite meaningful dialogue.

Examples to look at are Ali Pulver's 'Pop-Up-Lunch:' http://designtrust.blogspot.com/2009/12/pop-up-lunch-coolest-thesis-ever.html

And Caroline Woolard's project, 'Have a Seat:'
http://we-make-money-not-art.com/archives/2006/09/have-a-seat-by.php

Both are in NYC.
Good luck!
 
Meena Kadri's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
December 28, 2011, 01:15AM
Inspiring examples, Adriana!
Mike McDearmon's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
December 28, 2011, 04:49AM
I love all these links, especially how simple and conspicuous the yellow chair is!

I'll add another that you might like - this one's all about getting neighbors to connect simply by using the front porch once a week: http://www.sarvodayausa.org/story/meet-the-neighbors/
Meena Kadri's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
December 28, 2011, 08:42PM
Mike – you can make updates to your entry at any time using the Update Entry button up there on the right. Here's an example of how built up ideas can get over the course of a challenge: http://www.openideo.com/open/localfood/winners-announced/public-kitchen/ Let's bring on the builds and spell out the specifics!
December 19, 2011, 08:22PM
I've also been thinking about this and admire the elemental simplicity of your resources list. One thing I'm interested in is the storytelling opportunities that might result from such an endeavor. I'm thinking in particular about the Marino Abrimovic exhibit at the Museum of Modern Art in New York. While that exhibit was silent, it would be fascinating to see what people discuss when given two chairs and a small amount of time. You can read about and see some images from the exhibit here: http://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2010/marinaabramovic/
December 10, 2011, 02:29AM
I really like how this is a step towards building communities again. It has come to my attention how there is an increase in people being very focused on themselves and forgetting that they are part of a bigger community. We can do so much more when we work together and how can we all work together if we can't even manage to connect with our fellow neighbors and city-dwellers. I look forward to seeing how this will develop.

On a side note - there was an installation at the V&A Museum this year during the London Design Week. The Bouroullec Brothers in collaboration with Kvadrat designed an installation piece which was a essentially a large field of textile in various colors that slanted slightly upwards towards the sides. People came and took of their shoes and sat, lay, and just hung out in this large installation. It made me think of it as a potentially large public outdoor furniture piece that encourages people to mingle and share a space - maybe even promoting conversation :)
Paul Reader's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
December 11, 2011, 03:37PM
Jens, this is a fascinating idea and Rinelle is right, today we are often very self-absorbed. I have participated in something similar to this on a company level and taking it into the community is both a little daunting and exhilarating. As you say process is more important than outcome. What sort of topics do you see as being good to initiate dialog?
Jens Mortensen's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
December 11, 2011, 07:19PM
Rinelle! Thank you for you comment! I very much agree with you that so much lies in the relationships between people. I also see more and more people (including myself) hiding behind their computers, only communication online. I believe that it has a more positive impact having dialogs face to face.
Jens Mortensen's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
December 11, 2011, 07:24PM
Paul, Thank you for your comment! please share more of your experiences. I believe that a good topic to start with could be "how do you look at your local community today" and other topics that can relate to this assignment about detroit, I think its very important to involve that local people from the start. If we mix the local people Together with Entrepreneurs and "new thinkers" ( that are not from detroit) I think we would have a good start to get some ideas growing where we have both local and not local people feeling ownership for the outcome.
Szilvia Varga's reply to Johan Löfström's comment
December 12, 2011, 06:56AM
What if you installed these chairs like on the picture above and you would have these 'new thinkers' lurking around them and when someone sat on one of those chairs one of the new thinkers would grab the other chair and try and start a conversation.

This way could also have more directed discussions to find out the topics that really matter for the locals assuming your new thinkers are well trained in asking open questions and are active listeners :)

I'm sure I'd think it's a little weird if someone sat right across from me on the other chair but if they told me they are doing some research or just tried to have a casual conversation with me I would go along with it.

How about you guys?
close

Login

Forgot my password?

New user? Sign up!