The Challenge
775 followers
How might we design an accessible election experience for everyone?
Concept
Interactive Stimuli Voting
Combining output interfaces (Audio and Video) even in different languages, with input stimuli interfaces (switches, camera mouse, speech recognition, oral mouse, etc ), we can make voting accessible to practically all people.This accessible voting booth, within all or some polling stations, might enable people with most kinds of disabilities to cast their votes anonymously.
The interface could include a combination of adaptive technology that without requiring a large investment, could facilitate the process. It could include Audio (head phones) and Video ( to enlarge the options ) in order to let the voter know the options, along with a few different stimuli recognition hardware options ( Pal pad switches, camera mouse, speech recognition, or others) in order to allow a voting process. (( Addaptive technology links : www.quadjoy.com, www.eyetechds.com, www.bilila.com, www.infogrip, www.equalitytechnology.org ))
If the vote is emitted
electronically, the aforementioned solution is the end of it, but if the ballot
is a physical one, then some additional economic infrastructure should be
included to ensure marking ((The selection could trigger a DOT Matrix printer
to mark each ballot in the proper place)) and then dropping the ballot in the
proper boxes without needing the help of anyone else.
Some of the inspirations mentioned size restrictions, and the actual process of accessing the polling station, so I guess we would need to define minimal standards for polling station size, door width, inside circulations, ramps, etc.
There were also some mentions about transparency, and I believe that having this physical booth might solve most of the transparency issue.
An additional feature could be combining this with a Crowds.Mapping solution as Nat Manning commented on her inspiration, which could help schedule the easiest time slots for voters with disabilities.https://crowdmap.com/mhi
How will this concept improve election accessibility for everyone?
It is important to mention that we still need to choose the right combination of interfaces in order to properly design a solution that covers all potential voters needs.
How well does this concept adapt to the changing needs of different voter communities?
1- Needs to be economic, or comply with budget restrictions.
2- Should be user friendly in term of installations and dismounting.
3- Has to be easy to pack an unpack in a relatively small and light package or case in order to transport it.
What kinds of resources – whether time, money, people, partnerships, technology or otherwise – will be needed to get this concept off the ground?
1- A potential partner could be a developer of adaptive technology not only because they have already develop the required interfaces, but also to take advantage of the massive exposure they can get.
2- Another potential partner is a massive hardware producer, so that the production costs can be reduced to the minimal expression.
Having gotten the most economic and feasible solution, we still would need either some commercial sponsorships and/or money from electoral authorities in order to fund the equipment.
My Virtual Team
Anne Laure Fayad – Phantonm Recoreder
Kathryn Peters – Social media
Nat Manning Crowds sourcing

New here?










