Challenge phases Main content User comments Concept's statistics and author info Related themes, inspirations and concepts Share concept Shallenge activity feed Footer links
Login

The Challenge

775 followers

How might we design an accessible election experience for everyone? Read the challenge brief

Concept

Interactive Stimuli Voting

Combining output interfaces (Audio and Video) even in different languages, with input stimuli interfaces (switches, camera mouse, speech recognition, oral mouse, etc ), we can make voting accessible to practically all people.

This accessible voting booth, within all or some polling stations, might enable people with most kinds of disabilities to cast their votes anonymously.

The interface could include a combination of adaptive technology that without requiring a large investment, could facilitate the process. It could include Audio (head phones) and Video ( to enlarge the options ) in order to let the voter know the options, along with a few different stimuli recognition hardware options ( Pal pad switches, camera mouse, speech recognition, or others) in order to allow a voting process. (( Addaptive technology links : www.quadjoy.com, www.eyetechds.com, www.bilila.com, www.infogrip, www.equalitytechnology.org ))

If the vote is emitted electronically, the aforementioned solution is the end of it, but if the ballot is a physical one, then some additional economic infrastructure should be included to ensure marking ((The selection could trigger a DOT Matrix printer to mark each ballot in the proper place)) and then dropping the ballot in the proper boxes without needing the help of anyone else.

Some of the inspirations mentioned size restrictions, and the actual process of accessing the polling station, so I guess we would need to define minimal standards for polling station size, door width, inside circulations, ramps, etc.

There were also some mentions about transparency, and I believe that having this physical booth might solve most of the transparency issue.

An additional feature could be combining this with a Crowds.Mapping solution as Nat Manning commented on her inspiration, which could help schedule the easiest time slots for voters with disabilities.https://crowdmap.com/mhi

How will this concept improve election accessibility for everyone?

Having an interactive stimuli voting booth on each polling station, might cover all, or at least most, of the potential voters needs. Since the idea is to offer the ability to vote with any physical means, be it hands, feet, voice, mouth, head, eyes.
It is important to mention that we still need to choose the right combination of interfaces in order to properly design a solution that covers all potential voters needs.

How well does this concept adapt to the changing needs of different voter communities?

It could easily adapt to most communities as long as it can overcome some important challenges in order to create a "Universal" solution.
1- Needs to be economic, or comply with budget restrictions.
2- Should be user friendly in term of installations and dismounting.
3- Has to be easy to pack an unpack in a relatively small and light package or case in order to transport it.

What kinds of resources – whether time, money, people, partnerships, technology or otherwise – will be needed to get this concept off the ground?

We would need to partner with a couple of strong technological players, so that in combination we can reduce development and production time and costs.
1- A potential partner could be a developer of adaptive technology not only because they have already develop the required interfaces, but also to take advantage of the massive exposure they can get.
2- Another potential partner is a massive hardware producer, so that the production costs can be reduced to the minimal expression.

Having gotten the most economic and feasible solution, we still would need either some commercial sponsorships and/or money from electoral authorities in order to fund the equipment.

My Virtual Team

Steve Raphaelson – Eye software
Anne Laure Fayad – Phantonm Recoreder
Kathryn Peters – Social media
Nat Manning Crowds sourcing

Comments

Join the conversation and post a comment.

February 29, 2012, 01:21AM
Dan,
I believe you've just extracted the marrow from the idea. Interactive stimuli is just a way to “mark the ballot”, but there are still many other issues to solve. For example, mixing this with Priyanka’s “Voting Vans”, Nat Manning’s “Crowds sourcing” and so many other ideas, we might end up with a universal solution for an accessible election experience for everyone.
February 28, 2012, 06:50PM
I can't comment either way on immediate feasibility, but what I like about this idea is that it gets to the idea that we have a lot of diverse tools out there for "marking" a ballot, even beyond pens, mice, punch cards, thumb prints, etc. The language of "interactive stimuli" and the visual here may distract from the fact that there may be ways to reconfigure the whole voting process that take into account voting orally, with gestures, with other devices, with eye-blinks, tapping one's feet (I should stop now...). Thinking about alternative methods of marking, forces a consideration of how much the whole voting infrastructure could be changed. This is a huge challenge, of course, but once that's really compelling.
February 25, 2012, 01:38PM
Hello Shane. I see your point and believe that your observation would be absolutely accurate if we were looking to find an integral solution for all people's everyday needs. But you have to remember that we are only trying to solve a very specific need, which is casting a vote, and in that sense we can be much more flexible in the solution, taking advantage of which ever physical resources each person might have, as well as from a combination of selected interactive stimuli interfaces available in the market.
February 25, 2012, 11:43AM
I'm not so sure that this is a workable solution. Assistive Technology is very personal. The technology that suits one individual will not suit another person. I fear that it would be effectively impossible or hugely expensive to have a full spectrum of Assistive Technology at every polling station.
close

Login

Forgot my password?

New user? Sign up!